Target format discussion.

Discussion in 'Project: Sonic Retro (Archive)' started by Jayextee, Dec 4, 2008.

  1. Jayextee

    Jayextee

    Comic Mischief Member
    3,218
    0
    0
    Kathmandu, Nepal
    I DONE MAKED GAMES.
    What format should this project be on?

    ---

    My opinion (Which, might I add, I have posted here with the purpose of it being disputed and/or discussed. Feel free, that's what the forum is here for); Mega CD.

    My reasons?
    • A Redbook audio soundtrack will allow for our musicians to experiment very freely for the most dynamic possible score.
    • Through emulation, this can reach a very wide audience. Off the top of my head, Mac, PC, PSP and Mega CD users could all play it. That's a lot of people there already. Not as much as Megadrive emulation, but I'm combining this with other factors, such as;
    • Playing on the original hardware is a piece of easy pie with the Mega CD format. Burn the ISO and go. This is appealing for many retro gamers (Who, by nature, will comprise a large part of the audience)
    • The format is limiting in so many ways. This will ensure authenticity, but the added capabilities of the Mega CD will allow for stunning set-pieces or special stages.
    Reasons against?
    • Coding for Mega CD is largely undiscovered territory here. I'm vaguely aware of a homebrew scene somewhere, but we can't be guaranteed any help in this area, nor should we take it for granted.
    • Not everybody has a Mega CD. Not every Megadrive emulator emulates it, either.
    • Offering an ISO that a person is essentially able to publish and possibly distribute themselves is quite likely to get us a cease-and-desist.
    Please, discuss; offer your own opinions, whatever.
     
  2. Qjimbo

    Qjimbo

    Your friendly neighbourhood lemming. Oldbie
    MegaCD would be wonderful, but a lot more work, however I do feel there are a lot of capable hackers here; more so than there are capable general programmers, so it could potentially be better than a fan game.
     
  3. Tweaker

    Tweaker

    Misfit
    12,389
    0
    0
    I maintain a firm belief that the next "main" installment of the Sonic series would not have been on the Genesis or Sega CD. If I had to target any platform for the game, it would either be the 32x or the Sega Saturn; the latter is a very unrealistic and unlikely platform to directly develop for, which is why I was under the assumption that we were developing for a PC platform to maintain the benefits of the Saturn without the drawback of having to program for it.

    I don't think the platform for the project is something that needs to be talked about any further—it's best if it's made for the PC, and eventually cross-compiled for other systems as we can manage it.
     
  4. muteKi

    muteKi

    Fuck it Member
    7,543
    0
    16
    As I've said before I agree with Tweaker here, for basically the same reasons he's given. It allows us to expand the color and detail of stages, but by using the PC we don't have to deal with hardware that is rather finicky -- I suppose it would be possible to create a Sega CD/32X combo game, as documentation exists for both devices, but it would be difficult and time-consuming to do so.
     
  5. Rokkan

    Rokkan

    Member
    794
    0
    0
    I think it should be designed for the PC. We shouldn't work with any kind of limitations, that will only consume more time and work.
    No color, sprite or number of shades in a single sprite limitation. All we gotta have is good sense, we'll not have a sprite that has 50 different colors!
    Also mp3 quality music just like Sonic CD.
     
  6. Jordanime

    Jordanime

    Member
    17
    0
    0
    The PC would probably be the best platform to develop for. The only reason I could see the value in developing for the Sega CD would be authenticity, but it's a pretty kitschy gimmick and I would wager a pain for developers, artists and programmers to work around the restrictions of that long defunct, buggy platform.

    (Not that I didn't love my Sega CD, back when it worked, and even then only didn't ask that I dump the RAM every time I started it up or messed up in playing the three different versions of Ecco the Dolphin CD I bought) :argh:
     
  7. Shadow Hog

    Shadow Hog

    "I'm a superdog!" Member
    Basically, what Tweaker said. A <I>Sonic</I> game, as if it had been made for the Saturn - but since Saturn homebrew is in relative infancy (I sort of wish it wasn't), we'll just shift it over to the PC and <b>pretend</b> we're doing the Saturn.

    Basically, it means the usual 2D sprites, backgrounds, what have you, but polygonal effects are fair game (albeit if we're really going to run all the way home with this, transparent polygons would have the awful "mesh" transparency the Saturn is notorious for), zooming in and out is fair game (another 2D Saturn game Sega developed, <I>Astal</I>, does quite a bit of this), dynamic rotations of sprites is fair game, relatively large amounts of sprites on-screen at the same time is fair game (think debris when you bust a badnik, for instance), true color is more or less fair game (I think; the Saturn might have had some palette restrictions, I forget; although, even if it does, it's still much higher than the Genesis), and, if we really want to, true 3D backgrounds here and there are fair game.

    I don't actually expect that last one, but by all means, go crazy with the others. Heck, just imagine a large boss, made up of many sprites, rotating around all over the place, acting as its "limbs" of sorts, without having to draw a pose for every possible position... this is the kind of thing Sega DID during this era - they EMBRACED such shows of technical wizardry, just to drive home that their baby <b>could</b> do these things. Again, see <I>Astal</I>, and to a lesser extent (given that it's 2.5D) the <I>Clockwork Knight</I> series.

    tl;dr: basically just PC, except acting a bit show-offy
     
  8. Couldn't of said it better mysellf. A Sega CD for the PC. Maybe in an ISO? Nah maybe just a plain .EXE. Yes deifnately, an .EXE. Install and away you go! No limitations like we would have producing it as a rom (.bin) or keeping to Sega specs of the Sega Megadrive/CD/32X. I would suggest more but that would just be repeating Rave. A must is: 'Unlimited colours' so that any of the people who have produced sprites not in the colour range of 32-bit won't have to redo anything. It will save alot of time.
     
  9. MKAmeX

    MKAmeX

    Member
    279
    0
    16
    California
    Needlemouse, Sonic Boom, Graphic Design
    I agree with everyone who says PC. It's probably the best option at the moment, unless there's a major breakthrough in CD/32X hacking, I just don't see how it can work. A lot of people can't run saturn emulators at a capable speed, and most don't even own one. I'd say just go with the one that has the most range of people, which would probably be Megadrive/Genesis, but that'll probably limit what we're trying to achieve.

    Also, with the sprites, it's really a habit of mine to work with only 16 colors on a single sprite, so I'd go insane if I had to use any more. So even if we do have access to 50 bajillion colors, try to limit yourself to anything below 50. =P
     
  10. roxahris

    roxahris

    Everyone's a hypocrite. Take my word for it. Member
    1,224
    0
    0
    Doing anything at all
    I have to agree with Tweaker and Shadow Hog. Unfortunately, I have nothing else worthwhile to contribute on the subject.
     
  11. Jan Abaza

    Jan Abaza

    Oldbie
    499
    0
    0
    This is...wrong on so many levels I'm having trouble keeping my mouth shut...

    Developing for the "PC"? Don't you mean Windows? (...an .EXE file? I run two Linux boxes, and neither has .exe files in them other than WINE stuff. But they're still PCs.) Would the C source code be compiled for any of the Linux distros, too?

    No limitations! Yeah, in consuming RAM. But also zero portability compared to .bin files. Sonic 3K's original binary is 4 MB. Sonic 3K's Windows binary+executable+junk is somewhere along 9. The Windows version lags heavily in my portable emulator machine. The emulated Genesis version doesn't.

    When choosing a platform, couldn't you just select one that doesn't waste so much space on ram and hard drive? You know, actual portable environment, as opposed to the multitude of APIs and DirectX dependencies Windows brings with them? It is my opinion that by using Windows to code a game like this, you are either limiting your output or making yourself a lot of work later on, when you want to 'port' your game to other environments.
     
  12. Quirk

    Quirk

    Member
    2
    0
    0
    I'm all for Sega CD/Genesis format. Something about being able to play it on a real Genesis hooked to a crappy TV seems really appealing. I prefer Sega CD because I would love to see classic Sonic with CD audio music again, but I can see that being a real bitch to get all set up. Why not stay with Genesis then? We know the most about the Genesis game's architecture right? Wouldn't it be easier to rebuild a previous Sonic than code PC one from scratch? Also, that way you could buy a Genesis flash cart, load it on there and play it on the real thing.

    With the flash cart you could even sell a "Sonic Retro" kit on eBay or something for the hardcore that would come with a Flash Cart, PC-cart cable and a CD containing an IPS patch (no rom)
     
  13. Tweaker

    Tweaker

    Misfit
    12,389
    0
    0
    If a program is written in C, it can be compiled for damn near anything, not just different operating systems. If the engine is coded right, though, then yes—it could be compiled for Linux; hell, it could be compiled for Mac! Those are probably the marginally "easier" ports to make, though.

    That's because you're comparing two emulators—one for the Genesis (which takes a lot less to emulate well) and one that emulates... what, x86? WINE? Not sure what you're using. The point is, it's not directly comparing the two programs and how they're coded—it's comparing how well the emulators are coded.

    If you compiled directly for Linux, directly for the PSP, or directly for the DS, it's going to go a lot faster than if you emulated it. Still, emulating something on another system doesn't magically make it work natively on the system; writing it in C and cross-compiling, however, would. That's the primary difference here.

    As I mentioned above, the point is to develop on, and primarily for PC platforms—not strictly Windows. If coded properly, the modular nature of the engine could allow it to be natively running on a multitude of systems from the Dreamcast to the PSP. That's the advantage. If you develop straight for the Genesis, you're going to have the same limitations no matter what platform you decide to emulate the system on—it's still a Genesis.
     
  14. synchronizer

    synchronizer

    Member
    1,916
    0
    16
    Is there anyway to make a ppc mac version? Sonic Retro is the only Sonic engine I know that can create one. Up at the top of the page it was stated that if on the MegaCD, through emulation, a mac could run it? How? No MegaCD emulators exist for ppc or even intel macs as far as I know. I wish for ppc... Although, I do have a Japanese un-modded MegaCD. I would be for the MegaCD as long as I could just burn a disk, put it in the CD drive and play without any modding. If someone could write a guide describing how to burn Project Retro on a CD, and as long as all regions are supported (japanese) then I would really like the game to be on the MegaCD. I still would like mac ppc/mac intel/windows though, but second choice is MegaCD for sure, especially since I would like to have a second Sonic game to play on it.

    But, I also have a PS3. Would I have to hack/mod anything to run Project retro, or would I just put it in a thumb-drive, open the file, and play it? I would enjoy playing it on my PS3.
     
  15. Axel Letterman

    Axel Letterman

    The Saiyan Hedgehog Member
    As many have said, Sonic Retro is gonna be focused on the x86 (Windows, Linux, OpenSolaris, etc) for the time being.
    But maybe sometime in the future there will be a PPC version (For PPC Macs and Wii).
     
  16. The Taxman

    The Taxman

    Tech Member
    673
    0
    0
    Retro Engine & Related Projects
    I think he might mean the Retro-Sonic Engine, which has an OSX port along with the Windows one. Man I'm getting sick of people mixing up Retro-Sonic with Sonic Retro... and this new project name isn't helping either :P
     
  17. synchronizer

    synchronizer

    Member
    1,916
    0
    16
    Yes, that is what I meant. The Retro-Sonic engine.
     
  18. NinjaMan

    NinjaMan

    Member
    14
    0
    0
    Huh? Linux isn't x86 specific. If you can compile something on x86 Linux, you can compile it on any Linux-supported architecture which has the libraries needed, including PPC. OS X is similar enough to Linux that chances are if the engine compiles under Linux, it would be reasonably simple for someone who knows their way around [Insert programming language the engine uses here] to create an Mac port.

    Of course, the larger issues may be that [idle speculation] we don't have any OS X developers helping out, or that we'll be using a closed source engine, [/idle speculation] I dunno.
     
  19. Afti

    Afti

    ORIGINAL MACHINE Member
    3,521
    0
    0
    Dreamcast/Wii/PC using portable C code.


    All more than powerful enough for 2D Sonic, all easy to run homebrew on, and all have a well-developed homebrew scene.


    Don't call any system-specific libraries, and use basically the same source for all three.
     
  20. TmEE

    TmEE

    Master of OPL3-SA2/3 Tech Member
    1,726
    0
    0
    Estonia, Rapla City
    T-04YBSC-A !
    Saturn is much less pain than its turned out to be... learning the system would take time though, but that's so with any system. It took me over a year to get to know most of the aspects about MD. Since I have most tools already developed, messing with Saturn would be easier as I just have to adjust my tools for Saturn, not code everything from scratch...

    I would like to see a VERY platform specific and optimized non-portable version (platform being a game console that is emulated, and emulated well).