Yeah, that review is just no good at all. Reminds me of that other review posted here. Both claim they "wanted to like the game," I don't believe them at all. I can't even agree with them on points I do think have truth to them; it's like when you don't like a food but someone else talks about it like it's God's sin, and it's like, nah, it's not like that at all. Though the other review is just a random person, I especially expect enough integrity from Sterling to not post misinformation about how the director claimed the game is a playtest or early access or whatever. It's pretty clear they only brought it up because it confirmed their already wildly negative opinions (since it was less than a day before they published their review) and like, yeah, I'm not going to read their reviews if they're like this. I'll stick to their regular news videos.