Game Informer are the World's biggest....

BtCE · Aug 19, 2003

Sonic Haters Here are some of there ratings:
Sonic Pinball Party: 6/10
Sonic DX DC: 5/10
Sonic Advance 2: 7.5/10
ALOT OF OTHER MAGAZINES GAVE THESE GAMES MUC MUCH HIGHER RATINGS!
apparently if the game has the name sonic in it they automatically give it a bad score, and they are LIARS! They rated sonic DX directors cut in the may issue, which comes out in april, and they probobly wrote most of it in march. I bet they rated the DEMO. All they had was a press relaesd picture that EVERY OTHER MAGAZINE HAD. They just want to piss people off, don't they? There were like 3-4 more issues before game now rated it, and 3 issues before GMR rated it. Buncha lieng bastards, if you ask me. Ill write what they wrote sometime soon.

shadow111 · Aug 19, 2003

ya ur probably correct there BtCE

BtCE · Aug 19, 2003

I hate GI!! I HATE YOU!!!!!! GI!!!!!!!

Fang Dah Sniper · Aug 19, 2003

Well Actaully nintendo power is just as bad,most games that aren't nintendo get horrible ratings unless there really good,But most of the nintendo games get great and sometimes perfect ratings.

PC2 · Aug 19, 2003

But... But, I collect Nintendo Po- *attacked by various viewers*

BtCE · Aug 19, 2003

Seriosly, why does GI hate Sonic?!

Fang Dah Sniper · Aug 19, 2003

PC2 said:

But... But, I collect Nintendo Po- *attacked by various viewers*
Click to expand...

Oh ok im sorry I was just pointing out

Fang Dah Sniper · Aug 19, 2003

Beyond the Chaos Emeralds said:

Seriosly, why does GI hate Sonic?!
Click to expand...

probably cause there assholes who like fighting games much better <_<

PC2 · Aug 19, 2003

And sports and shooting ones too. :P

Fang Dah Sniper · Aug 19, 2003

PC2 said:

And sports and shooting ones too. :P
Click to expand...

I guess in there eye its just a dumb chracter from a game,But what they do not see is the amazing super fast blue hedgehog that everyone knows and loves. B)

ICEknight · Aug 19, 2003

I think those ratings are pretty accurate, for what I've read and seen from those games.

BtCE · Aug 19, 2003

So you think SADX sucked? Well, youre VERY VERY wrong, my friend

Fang Dah Sniper · Aug 19, 2003

I think sonic adventure dx rocked it was my favorite sonic adventure game,but sonic adventure 2 battle was good esspecially when playing green hill that's my favoite level in the game

BtCE · Aug 19, 2003

Fang_Dah_Sniper said:

I think sonic adventure dx rocked it was my favorite sonic adventure game,but sonic adventure 2 battle was good esspecially when playing green hill that's my favoite level in the game
Click to expand...

uh-huh

Trigahd · Aug 20, 2003

SADX was a very good game, however it was incredibly short and the bosses were easy to defeat, which is probably the reason why they gave it a bad score. They didn't change much from the DC version (If I'm wrong, please correct me), except add in the mission mode for more of a challenge. So that's probably why they gave it a bad rating. They were also probably thinking that it was like some kiddie game too, seeing the difficulty. Either that or they hate Adventure games.

PC2 · Aug 20, 2003

Well I don't own a DC, so that was one step forward..

Fang Dah Sniper · Aug 20, 2003

Trigahd said:

SADX was a very good game, however it was incredibly short and the bosses were easy to defeat, which is probably the reason why they gave it a bad score. They didn't change much from the DC version (If I'm wrong, please correct me), except add in the mission mode for more of a challenge. So that's probably why they gave it a bad rating. They were also probably thinking that it was like some kiddie game too, seeing the difficulty. Either that or they hate Adventure games.
Click to expand...

well I have to agree with u there it was a short game but it still was somewat challenging.There are alot of glicthes to the game like how to get tails into emerald coast I've tried it(without gameshark).

shadow111 · Aug 20, 2003

Trigahd said:

SADX was a very good game, however it was incredibly short and the bosses were easy to defeat, which is probably the reason why they gave it a bad score. They didn't change much from the DC version (If I'm wrong, please correct me), except add in the mission mode for more of a challenge. So that's probably why they gave it a bad rating. They were also probably thinking that it was like some kiddie game too, seeing the difficulty. Either that or they hate Adventure games.
Click to expand...

I find no problem wit it

BtCE · Aug 20, 2003

Trigahd said:

SADX was a very good game, however it was incredibly short and the bosses were easy to defeat, which is probably the reason why they gave it a bad score. They didn't change much from the DC version (If I'm wrong, please correct me), except add in the mission mode for more of a challenge. So that's probably why they gave it a bad rating. They were also probably thinking that it was like some kiddie game too, seeing the difficulty. Either that or they hate Adventure games.
Click to expand...

Try getting 100%. My time, 24:07. The game also provides much replayability through the GG games. 24:07 Is a nice amount of time for an adventure game. And at the time they reviewed it, there WAS NO MENTION OF MISSION MODE. They wrote that the only extras were GG games, so they DID lie.

Fang Dah Sniper · Aug 20, 2003

Yes but they could've forgoten to metion it.I find the funnest part of the game is unlocking and playing the game gear games.

Game Informer are the World's biggest....

Useful Searches