I like it. It's excellent for a quick attempt, and I can't wait to see how it comes along.
Tails in Sonic 1 v1.1 he swims, he flies, he spindashes
#61
Posted 24 December 2005 - 02:21 AM
I like it. It's excellent for a quick attempt, and I can't wait to see how it comes along.
#62
Posted 24 December 2005 - 07:10 AM
#63
Posted 24 December 2005 - 07:20 AM
LOst, on Dec 24 2005, 07:02 AM, said:
Rika Chou, on Dec 24 2005, 08:43 AM, said:
LOst, on Dec 23 2005, 09:42 PM, said:
Lost..
I'm sorry, but that was not appropriate. Quality is a matter of opinion.
If your going to criticize a hack, at least make it a constructive criticism.
After so many complains about the hack bugs out, I see it that way. Lack of quality and time, and understanding of the Sonic engine.
You know what I think about destroying the Sonic engine. Everyone can make a game hang, but do it with a bad game, and not with Sonic. Sonic deserves better.
So the first Sonic hack you made had no bugs in it? The only way drx will make bugless hacks is through practise, so there's bound to be bugs at first which will hopefully get ironed out.
I thought you'd be pleased with this actually, would you rather it was a boring palette hack? I'd personally rather have something interesting/unique that's buggy than something dull that works.
#64
Posted 24 December 2005 - 07:27 AM
LOst, on Dec 24 2005, 07:02 AM, said:
Rika Chou, on Dec 24 2005, 08:43 AM, said:
LOst, on Dec 23 2005, 09:42 PM, said:
Lost..
I'm sorry, but that was not appropriate. Quality is a matter of opinion.
If your going to criticize a hack, at least make it a constructive criticism.
After so many complains about the hack bugs out, I see it that way. Lack of quality and time, and understanding of the Sonic engine.
You know what I think about destroying the Sonic engine. Everyone can make a game hang, but do it with a bad game, and not with Sonic. Sonic deserves better.
This is the stupidest crap I've ever read!!! Everything has bugs! Get over it! Please stop pluaging the forums by telling everyone their hacks are of poor quality. If you don't want to destory the sonic engine don't open the rom at all!
Geez this is pissing me off. Merry fucking Christmas.
#65
Posted 24 December 2005 - 08:25 AM
LOst, on Dec 24 2005, 07:02 AM, said:
Rika Chou, on Dec 24 2005, 08:43 AM, said:
LOst, on Dec 23 2005, 09:42 PM, said:
Lost..
I'm sorry, but that was not appropriate. Quality is a matter of opinion.
If your going to criticize a hack, at least make it a constructive criticism.
After so many complains about the hack bugs out, I see it that way. Lack of quality and time, and understanding of the Sonic engine.
You know what I think about destroying the Sonic engine. Everyone can make a game hang, but do it with a bad game, and not with Sonic. Sonic deserves better.
Get your head out of your arse you arrogant bastard and do something yourself then. You're first to criticise people for having bugs in their hack, but your hacks were nothing bug free and spectacular either. The way you go on, you'd think you fucking were Yuji Naka. You're not him, and you never will be.
#66
Posted 24 December 2005 - 08:36 AM
LOst, on Dec 24 2005, 02:02 AM, said:
Rika Chou, on Dec 24 2005, 08:43 AM, said:
LOst, on Dec 23 2005, 09:42 PM, said:
Lost..
I'm sorry, but that was not appropriate. Quality is a matter of opinion.
If your going to criticize a hack, at least make it a constructive criticism.
After so many complains about the hack bugs out, I see it that way. Lack of quality and time, and understanding of the Sonic engine.
You know what I think about destroying the Sonic engine. Everyone can make a game hang, but do it with a bad game, and not with Sonic. Sonic deserves better.
I find this a LOT more playable, bugs and all, than Eggman in Sonic 1. Was that lack of quality and time?
#67
Posted 24 December 2005 - 09:26 AM
Quote
Good Point. Actually, Eggman was programmed from zero in that hack, but anyway, LOst didnīt needed to say that, before remember his past. =P
#68
Posted 24 December 2005 - 12:08 PM
StephenUK, on Dec 24 2005, 08:25 AM, said:

Ooh, buuuurn.
#70
Posted 24 December 2005 - 05:10 PM
*mauled by lost*
#71
Posted 24 December 2005 - 10:49 PM
LOst, make your own version plz. =P
Or can you even? I wonder... You talk shit, but I hardly see you release stuff. Once again though, your project that seems close to release will really determine if my claims are solid.
So I'll wait. Don't dissapoint me, or I'll be a sad panda. =(
#72
Posted 24 December 2005 - 11:24 PM
If you people want a competition, then do your own version and I will beat you 100 times over.
drx's hack is not a competition. I would never spend time beating him. That would be unfair. He never asked for it.
#73
Posted 25 December 2005 - 02:32 AM
I can't make N64 games. I never even tried to make a better N64 game than Superman 64. Does that mean I lose the right to diss supermand 64?
Not all wine tasters have to work at wineries.
#74
Posted 25 December 2005 - 03:15 AM
LOst, on Dec 24 2005, 09:24 PM, said:
Just curious..
Have you looked at the work he did in the ROM? I mean technically? A single typo could make the game hang like that, and I want to know how you rate quality.
#75
Posted 25 December 2005 - 05:24 AM
Rika Chou, on Dec 25 2005, 11:15 AM, said:
LOst, on Dec 24 2005, 09:24 PM, said:
Just curious..
Have you looked at the work he did in the ROM? I mean technically? A single typo could make the game hang like that, and I want to know how you rate quality.
It is not my job to find or fix drx's bugs.
Here is one thing I can say for sure to all of you with hacks that I am not satisfied with:
I am not going into your ROM to look for stuff to tell you what you did wrong. I feel that your ROM and your techniques are your private stuff. If you are asking for help I will help finding it. But I will never touch your work to prove or to steal your ideas.


00