Posted 15 June 2015 - 05:16 PM
-
Posts:
28
-
Joined:
19-July 14
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:127.0.0.1
-
Project:Crash Mania V5
01
Felik, on 15 June 2015 - 03:50 PM, said:
His explanation of why Sonic 06 time travel is not any less competent than Back to the Future is objective and well argumented. Your reason why B2F time travel is more competent than 06 is basically "Back to the Future is better and I like it more so it must be better than 06 in every way"
I... never said Back to the Future's time travel was more competent? I said I liked the writing better, but I guess having an opinion is frowned upon by the likes of you, then?
I've already admitted the film has lots of problems with its time travel from a logical perspective, I've agreed that DigitalDuck's explanation is spot on, and I said that I like how he's got a point of view quite different from mine, so uh... what's your beef, buddy? What do I need to say for you to get off my case?
Posted 19 June 2015 - 08:53 AM
- I'm not a furry.
-
-
Posts:
965
-
Joined:
04-October 10
-
Gender:Male
-
Project:TOO MANY. BUT ONE LESS.
-
Wiki edits:5
05
Are we all sure this isn't a circlejerk thread about something that isn't even that well thought out by the devs themselves
Posted 19 June 2015 - 11:30 AM
- We're enemies. Rivals. Opposites. Reverses of one another.
-
-
Posts:
487
-
Joined:
06-March 14
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Pale Blue Dot
-
Project:College
04
Chimera, on 19 June 2015 - 08:53 AM, said:
Are we all sure this isn't a circlejerk thread about something that isn't even that well thought out by the devs themselves
This was a circlejerk from the very beginning looking at how this thread was started
Seriously why is this still open?
Posted 19 June 2015 - 01:55 PM
- Cat-herder
-
-
Posts:
14494
-
Joined:
12-January 03
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Berkshire, England
-
Project:VGDB
-
Wiki edits:3,204
03
Honestly? Because I saw no real justified reason to close it. =P
Now it's been brought up, though... *waves mod wand*
01
