Chibisteven, on 17 December 2013 - 12:32 AM, said:
The only thing Fragmentation can do is slow access time to a files on a hard drive (increased latency). Loading a program would just take longer because it's scattered everywhere. The is not actual problem with any solid state drive or flash device and just has more to do with the mechinical movement of the heads and plates spinning by on mechinical drives, they always spin at the same speed, too but files located in the sectors near the spindle of any drive will have a slower data rate because of the physics of any round flat spinning disc, more data will pass by on the outer edge before it finds what it wants, it takes time for the head to align with any track on the drive and then wait for it to spin right by the head reading it.
A flash drive / solid state doesn't have the issue, so it loads instantly because it's on a microchip. In fact defragging those will wear them out faster, where a traditional hard disk has an infinite seemly amount of rewrites, a microchip has a finite amount.
A flash drive / solid state doesn't have the issue, so it loads instantly because it's on a microchip. In fact defragging those will wear them out faster, where a traditional hard disk has an infinite seemly amount of rewrites, a microchip has a finite amount.
That's a relief to know it only affects access speed, rather than forcing the drive to work harder. Now I'm a bit stuck to understand why the hard drive was making more noise, and in an interesting development, I haven't heard it reach the same noise level that I recorded in over two days on Windows, despite the HDD getting pretty warm while working on art. I guess this needs more research once the new drive arrives and I install Ubuntu natively onto it. Even if I panicked over nothing, having two hard drives is better than one.
EDIT : Okay, turns out it does still make noise, but I can't hear it at all when I'm listening to music, and it doesn't vibrate the case for me to notice.
Yeah, fragmentation isn't relevant with flash memory, since there are no physical moving parts needed to reach any of the sectors. I'd love to have an SSD for installing an OS to one of these days, boot times are much faster, or I could lengthen its lifetime by using it as a backup storage drive. It sucks solid state drives can only take so many writes for each sector, but seemingly every storage solution has a con that affects the life cycle, so it really depends on which downside is less inconvenient.
This post has been edited by .Luke: 17 December 2013 - 06:03 PM

00