Sony presents - Sonic the Smurfs One a year for an unknown number of years
#182
Posted 24 June 2014 - 10:50 PM
trakker, on 17 June 2014 - 12:39 PM, said:
It's gonna be live action Sonic X ep1-26, before all their homeworld stuff started leaking through. minus Sam Speed =P
Because it's easy as crap, comparatively speaking, to make a film like that instead of actually creating a world different than our own?
It's like Danger Mouse at the North Pole, but that could at least be excused by budget constraints compared to a frickin' film.
#183
Posted 29 June 2014 - 09:28 PM
Mecha Sally, on 12 June 2014 - 06:23 PM, said:
A Knothole Resident, on 13 June 2014 - 01:42 AM, said:
lolwut? No he didn't. He made up his own lore that had nothing to do with Sonic (and was mostly ripped off from things like Star Wars and World of Krypton anyway), and basically tied it in by saying "oh yeah and Sonic is their friend/Knuckles is related to them." The dude was practically proud that he didn't like or care about Sonic or its lore, all he liked was trying to be an even crazier, but far less talented, version of John Byrne.
A Knothole Resident, on 14 June 2014 - 09:37 PM, said:
Oh, okay then. Nevermind. Glad we agree. (Yeah, we mostly agreed the whole time, but I wanted to join you in bashing Penders.)
Candescence, on 15 June 2014 - 01:22 AM, said:
Lately? If you count the last 20+ years as lately, I suppose. Biggest difference between now and then is that back then he didn't have the internet to share his views, and we had to rely on his "art" to see into his twisted mind.
These writers we do have seem like they may very well know their stuff, which is nice. It may very well be moot, though, if the movie is anything like the recent games, which don't really care about continuity anymore. We'll see once we get more info on the film, I suppose. Personally, I'm hoping for a Death Egg Saga thing, expanded with the extra backstory we got in Adventure (since that was basically just expanding on the backstory from the Japanese manuals for Sonic 2 and 3&K anyway). Not that I expect it to happen. I'm more expecting something along the lines of X, which I didn't care for at all. But I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
As for the live action/animated bit, I'm actually not too worried about it. Of all the things in the film that could make or break it, I think that's one of the less important factors.
#184
Posted 02 September 2014 - 05:17 PM
About a month ago over on the SonicTheHedgehog subreddit, the writer for the upcoming Sonic film made a post about his new Facebook page. He was also answering a few questions in the comments. (Nothing too special, but some of it is interesting.)
It's been a while since I've last read it, so I don't remember much. I only skimmed through it, but I thought you guys would find it interesting. After reading it I have slightly higher hopes for the film though I won't say anything until we get at least one trailer.
Here's a link: http://www.reddit.co...ok_page_i_know/
Edit: Various grammar edits and such.
#185
Posted 02 September 2014 - 07:49 PM
Still, the fact he has shown how much of a fan he is has gone a long way towards relieving my doubt. That is, provided the studio doesn't force his script too far away from his vision.
#186
Posted 02 September 2014 - 09:05 PM
TheKazeblade, on 02 September 2014 - 07:49 PM, said:
Still, the fact he has shown how much of a fan he is has gone a long way towards relieving my doubt. That is, provided the studio doesn't force his script too far away from his vision.
I liked the reply of "Like Alvin and the Chipmunks only less Alvin and more awesome."
I have hopes, but like you said, the studio could possibly butcher the development...
..which isn't really way past cool.
#187
Posted 02 September 2014 - 09:08 PM
#188
Posted 19 November 2014 - 04:49 PM

So I guess lots of stuff is gonna get cut when inevitably execs want them to make it PG.
EDIT: Actually I just realized that this does give this rumor posted in the thread earlier some credibility: http://www.tracking-...iter-shortlist/
#189
Posted 19 November 2014 - 08:55 PM
#190
Posted 19 November 2014 - 09:39 PM
#191
Posted 19 November 2014 - 09:39 PM
TimmiT, on 19 November 2014 - 04:49 PM, said:

So I guess lots of stuff is gonna get cut when inevitably execs want them to make it PG.
EDIT: Actually I just realized that this does give this rumor posted in the thread earlier some credibility: http://www.tracking-...iter-shortlist/
What is this obsession about higher ratings? I mean, what are the expectations for a Sonic film? Blood, gore, guts, and mediocre-to-abyssmal standings on Rotten Tomatoes like Resident Evil, Silent Hill, Doom, or Postal? What exactly is the boundary between PG and PG-13 anyway? Profanity and suggestive dialogue (Guardians of the Galaxy say "Hi" from atop their big pile o' money)? Are we getting an ass-shot?
I know that they're trying to update him and his 'tude, but I don't think a PG-13 rating is really necessary. You can have a 'suitably' dark film with a lower rating, given the character and his respective universe in question. I mean, not every G and PG* movie is sunshine and lollipops, right? ... Right?
* This was especially the case for films initially rated PG before PG-13 was introduced in the mid-'80s.
EDIT:
Actually, now that I think of it, what would SatAM get these days? I mean since it predated the TV rating system by a few years.
#192
Posted 19 November 2014 - 09:46 PM
#193
Posted 19 November 2014 - 10:17 PM
#194
Posted 19 November 2014 - 10:23 PM
#195
Posted 19 November 2014 - 11:30 PM
If you people haven't seen Harlock yet, get on Netflix right fucking now. It's one of the highest rated animated films on the site.

00