New info on MJ involvement?
#241
Posted 06 July 2014 - 10:05 AM
#242
Posted 06 July 2014 - 01:39 PM
XCubed, on 06 July 2014 - 10:05 AM, said:
Cant forget about Stranger In Moscow in the game, 2 years before the actual song came out.
#243
Posted 07 July 2014 - 01:44 AM
There was a re-release of "The Essential Michael Jackson" that included a third disc with only a handful of songs, among them being "Jam" and "Stranger in Moscow." Do you think that could be someone's way of acknowledging their connection to Sonic 3?
#244
Posted 07 July 2014 - 03:00 AM
Skyler, on 07 July 2014 - 01:44 AM, said:
There was a re-release of "The Essential Michael Jackson" that included a third disc with only a handful of songs, among them being "Jam" and "Stranger in Moscow." Do you think that could be someone's way of acknowledging their connection to Sonic 3?
No. If it's the booklets saying something about it than yes. But in reality no and very difficult to prove at that. They could have just been popular songs.
A greatest hits compilation album means songs that sold a lot and could be a revised edition that includes songs that sold more because they probably just became hits with time. It happens more than you think. A Remastered edition and to include more popular songs, doesn't automatically mean acknowledgement of what you think. Record companies put these out sometimes without the input of the artist involved as the record company owns the original recording or master.
#245
Posted 07 July 2014 - 11:05 AM
nesboy43, on 06 July 2014 - 01:39 PM, said:
XCubed, on 06 July 2014 - 10:05 AM, said:
Cant forget about Stranger In Moscow in the game, 2 years before the actual song came out.
Whoops! Yeah. It's so well known that I forgot about including it. So we have 2 solid songs. So how is it that Jackson nor his estate sued for the use of these? (or perhaps they did?). It would be hilarious that the S&K Collection was develpoed during secretive litigation. But then Sega won on being able to re-release Sonic 3 a limited number of times....also explaining why we haven't seen much of the game in prior releases outside of the Sonic Mega Collection and the lack of a remastered version like 1 & 2. Ok, I'll stop now.
#246
Posted 09 July 2014 - 03:07 AM
XCubed, on 07 July 2014 - 11:05 AM, said:
nesboy43, on 06 July 2014 - 01:39 PM, said:
XCubed, on 06 July 2014 - 10:05 AM, said:
Cant forget about Stranger In Moscow in the game, 2 years before the actual song came out.
Whoops! Yeah. It's so well known that I forgot about including it. So we have 2 solid songs. So how is it that Jackson nor his estate sued for the use of these? (or perhaps they did?). It would be hilarious that the S&K Collection was develpoed during secretive litigation. But then Sega won on being able to re-release Sonic 3 a limited number of times....also explaining why we haven't seen much of the game in prior releases outside of the Sonic Mega Collection and the lack of a remastered version like 1 & 2. Ok, I'll stop now.
Well considering the fact that Brad Buxer was a musical arranger and sometimes a co-composer for Michael, along with Michael being a fan of the games, I think it is safe to say that he had no bitter feelings towards the game. If Tommy and Brad are to be believed than we can see that Michael only wanted his name removed at some point in development, not his music.
#247
Posted 09 July 2014 - 04:41 PM
XCubed, on 07 July 2014 - 11:05 AM, said:
nesboy43, on 06 July 2014 - 01:39 PM, said:
XCubed, on 06 July 2014 - 10:05 AM, said:
Cant forget about Stranger In Moscow in the game, 2 years before the actual song came out.
Whoops! Yeah. It's so well known that I forgot about including it. So we have 2 solid songs. So how is it that Jackson nor his estate sued for the use of these? (or perhaps they did?). It would be hilarious that the S&K Collection was develpoed during secretive litigation. But then Sega won on being able to re-release Sonic 3 a limited number of times....also explaining why we haven't seen much of the game in prior releases outside of the Sonic Mega Collection and the lack of a remastered version like 1 & 2. Ok, I'll stop now.
Just throwing a wild guess in the dark but I reckon the contract that MJ's musicians signed didn't cover for rereleases on future systems (hence why those tracks were changed in S8KPC). Then when MJ's involvement came to light, they realised Sega did just that and began legal action for unpaid royalties. Chances are I'm completely wrong though! It's all conjecture on my part here.
#248
Posted 24 August 2014 - 01:26 AM
#250
Posted 24 August 2014 - 11:49 AM
Xilla, on 09 July 2014 - 04:41 PM, said:
XCubed, on 07 July 2014 - 11:05 AM, said:
nesboy43, on 06 July 2014 - 01:39 PM, said:
XCubed, on 06 July 2014 - 10:05 AM, said:
Cant forget about Stranger In Moscow in the game, 2 years before the actual song came out.
Whoops! Yeah. It's so well known that I forgot about including it. So we have 2 solid songs. So how is it that Jackson nor his estate sued for the use of these? (or perhaps they did?). It would be hilarious that the S&K Collection was develpoed during secretive litigation. But then Sega won on being able to re-release Sonic 3 a limited number of times....also explaining why we haven't seen much of the game in prior releases outside of the Sonic Mega Collection and the lack of a remastered version like 1 & 2. Ok, I'll stop now.
Just throwing a wild guess in the dark but I reckon the contract that MJ's musicians signed didn't cover for rereleases on future systems (hence why those tracks were changed in S8KPC). Then when MJ's involvement came to light, they realised Sega did just that and began legal action for unpaid royalties. Chances are I'm completely wrong though! It's all conjecture on my part here.
But rereleases have happened...
#251
Posted 24 August 2014 - 11:53 AM
XCubed, on 24 August 2014 - 11:49 AM, said:
Xilla, on 09 July 2014 - 04:41 PM, said:
XCubed, on 07 July 2014 - 11:05 AM, said:
nesboy43, on 06 July 2014 - 01:39 PM, said:
XCubed, on 06 July 2014 - 10:05 AM, said:
Cant forget about Stranger In Moscow in the game, 2 years before the actual song came out.
Whoops! Yeah. It's so well known that I forgot about including it. So we have 2 solid songs. So how is it that Jackson nor his estate sued for the use of these? (or perhaps they did?). It would be hilarious that the S&K Collection was develpoed during secretive litigation. But then Sega won on being able to re-release Sonic 3 a limited number of times....also explaining why we haven't seen much of the game in prior releases outside of the Sonic Mega Collection and the lack of a remastered version like 1 & 2. Ok, I'll stop now.
Just throwing a wild guess in the dark but I reckon the contract that MJ's musicians signed didn't cover for rereleases on future systems (hence why those tracks were changed in S8KPC). Then when MJ's involvement came to light, they realised Sega did just that and began legal action for unpaid royalties. Chances are I'm completely wrong though! It's all conjecture on my part here.
But rereleases have happened...
Quote
#253
Posted 28 August 2014 - 01:53 PM
Master Emerald, on 24 August 2014 - 11:53 AM, said:
XCubed, on 24 August 2014 - 11:49 AM, said:
Xilla, on 09 July 2014 - 04:41 PM, said:
XCubed, on 07 July 2014 - 11:05 AM, said:
nesboy43, on 06 July 2014 - 01:39 PM, said:
XCubed, on 06 July 2014 - 10:05 AM, said:
Cant forget about Stranger In Moscow in the game, 2 years before the actual song came out.
Whoops! Yeah. It's so well known that I forgot about including it. So we have 2 solid songs. So how is it that Jackson nor his estate sued for the use of these? (or perhaps they did?). It would be hilarious that the S&K Collection was develpoed during secretive litigation. But then Sega won on being able to re-release Sonic 3 a limited number of times....also explaining why we haven't seen much of the game in prior releases outside of the Sonic Mega Collection and the lack of a remastered version like 1 & 2. Ok, I'll stop now.
Just throwing a wild guess in the dark but I reckon the contract that MJ's musicians signed didn't cover for rereleases on future systems (hence why those tracks were changed in S8KPC). Then when MJ's involvement came to light, they realised Sega did just that and began legal action for unpaid royalties. Chances are I'm completely wrong though! It's all conjecture on my part here.
But rereleases have happened...
Quote
I guess the royalties were so cheap it didn't matter after the S&K collection.

00