Sonic and Sega Retro Message Board: Why I Don't Like Sonic Games - Sonic and Sega Retro Message Board

Jump to content

Hey there, Guest!  (Log In · Register) Help
  • 6 Pages +
  • ◄ First
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
    Locked
    Locked Forum

Why I Don't Like Sonic Games

#61 User is offline Prototype 

Posted 07 January 2019 - 01:56 AM

  • Posts: 99
  • Joined: 13-August 17

View PostThe Negative Ion, on 07 January 2019 - 12:54 AM, said:

I'll keep it short and simple: I've learned my place and it's certainly not here. I'll spare you guys the tear-jerking monologue because I know that's not even the last thing you wanna see from me. But just know that all of this was my fault, not yours. I made myself look like a common brainless idiot who was only hating sonic for nothing more than attention right out of the gate and whether I intended to or not is irrelevant. To anyone who watched the video anyway, thank you guys for at least giving it the time of day whether you liked it/agreed with it or not. I've read all of your posts and have taken them into consideration, but I'm clearly not ready for this just yet; I'll take my leave for now. Overlord may do whatever he feels is necessary with me or this post.

Stupid, stupid me and this post... stupid fucking idiot...


I can't say I've been following this thread too much, but hey, step it back a little. No need to beat yourself up about it. You started a discussion and people discussed. Discussions don't always go as planned. And always keep in mind that a challenge or counterpoint to, or disagreement with your opinion does not constitute an attack on you.

Relax, man. No need for drama.
This post has been edited by Prototype: 07 January 2019 - 01:57 AM

#62 User is offline Naean 

Posted 07 January 2019 - 08:04 AM

  • Self-employed artist with affinity for fine detail pen drawings.
  • Posts: 492
  • Joined: 25-February 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United Kingdom
  • Project:2D. Sonic Level Designs
  • Wiki edits:24

View PostFollOw, on 07 January 2019 - 01:42 AM, said:

Didn't watch the video but I assume its along the lines of "Sonic was never good" IGN goofiness...

It's actually nothing like IGN's complete joke of a Sonic video, nor is it exactly like Previously Recorded's "Sonic, The Most Overrated Game Ever?" video either. As far as I can tell, The Negative Ion never stated that he thinks "Sonic was never good" in the flawed, blanket statement way that some members of IGN tried to state.

While I find myself disagreeing with many of The Negative Ion's points in the video, for the most part however (Some remarks and exaggerated video edits aside.), he comes across as sincere in his critiques and difficulties when trying to get into playing Sonic games as an adult.

I think that his lack-of-visibility/inability-to-react-in-time complaint actually has some validity to it, but I also feel like there may be a 'personality clash' going on here; some game genres, and specific gameplay styles, are just never going to gel with certain people, and that's totally fine. I think that some people are 'inherently' more attracted towards Sonic games and their demand for fast reaction times, have the ability to usually react in time, and have no/lesser issues with memorising certain gameplay patterns and some level design sections.

For others, Sonic games may never click with them, which is fair; no single game can ever appeal to everyone with 100% satisfaction, which is a key reason why diversity in game genres is so important. For the most part, I love replaying Sonic 3 & Knuckles myself, yet first person shooters just fail to appeal to me. First person shooters don't click with my interests, but that's okay, and there will probably be at least a minority of people who find those types of games more appealing than me.

For everyone who has any interest in video games, generally speaking, I'd argue that there's likely to be at least 1 specific game or 1 game genre out there that can appeal to them, even if not a perfect fit. In fact, no game is ever immaculate; there is always room for some improvement, or a different way to execute an idea. At the same time though, it can be useful to reflect on yourself sometimes, and you may come to the conclusion of "Perhaps, this type of game/this specific game, just isn't for me.", or something to a similar effect.

At the end of the day, there's only so far anyone is willing to adjust their opinions. How far that may be is unique from person to person, absolutely, but at the same time, I think it's safe to say that we all have our own 'hard coded' preferences. Is there typically significant wiggle room for persuasion and/or absorbing of different perspectives? Definitely! However, we cannot choose the brain that we were born with, and our mental adjustments are finite.
This post has been edited by Naean: 07 January 2019 - 08:24 AM

#63 User is offline Ashura96 

Posted 07 January 2019 - 08:16 AM

  • FUTURE 2222
  • Posts: 1428
  • Joined: 13-January 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dallas, Texas
  • Wiki edits:6

View PostThe Negative Ion, on 04 January 2019 - 10:44 AM, said:

View PostAshura96, on 03 January 2019 - 12:13 PM, said:

Man and here I thought Sonic Mania's rave reviews had all these types go away.

Could you clarify what you mean by "types?" It could really refer to anything, whether it be fans, haters, people who are neutral to the series, etc.. It's just that you got me curious when you mentioned that Sonic Mania had reduced its quantity. Sorry for asking if it would be too much trouble for you.


Just now catching up. So the "type" I was referring to was that in the years leading up to Sonic Mania, and after the piss poor ass backwards atrocity of Sonic Boom: Rise of Lyric, there just seemed to be a significant number of people coming out of the woodwork to declare "Sonic was never good." The support for this seem to grow and grow until Mania came out with its high reviews across the board. Then those in the "Sonic was never good" camp started to fall off again. You're probably the first to begin this cycle anew that I've seen in the past year or so.

#64 User is offline Laura 

Posted 07 January 2019 - 11:03 AM

  • Brightened Eyes
  • Posts: 572
  • Joined: 01-November 12
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
I'm kind of disappointed Negative Ion just stormed off like that because I really liked his video and wanted to discuss it with him :/

#65 User is offline ICEknight 

Posted 07 January 2019 - 01:06 PM

  • Posts: 11169
  • Joined: 11-January 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Spain
  • Wiki edits:18
How many new subscribers was this stunt worth? Asking for a friend. :v:

#66 User is offline Caniad Bach 

Posted 07 January 2019 - 01:06 PM

  • is a peanut
  • Posts: 1871
  • Joined: 18-March 10
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Cymru
I didn't watch the video because honestly there's enough negativity on YouTube, and I have better things to do with my time than look at the reasons why someone doesn't like something. It appears the lad put effort and thought into this, but I would argue it's misplaced. I'd much rather hear about something someone is actually passionate about, life is too short and there's enough misery going on in the world to waste energy on something that is purely negative - whether that's just shitting on something for the sake of it or something more akin to an "acedemic" arguement, as is supposedly evident here.

Don't get me wrong - I get it - "internet criticism" being negative has been in-vogue since AVGN came around, and THE WORST [X] EVER videos on YouTube get far higher views on average than the equivalent BEST [X] EVER. People like schadenfreude, but I've been hearing "Sonic is bad, actually" arguments since before Sonic was actually bad, so I've heard it all already. If the argument is "Well it just isn't for me", then - no offence intended, why should I care about some random person on the internet telling me that something isn't for them? Football isn't for me, so I stay out of the World Cup threads.

I've played 5 different Assassins Creed games for an hour before giving up, and have ultimately decided the series isn't for me, but I wouldn't join an Assassins Creed message board just to say "Hello here is my TED talk on why your hobby is bad."

I think "Why are you here?" is a reasonable question.

Ultimately, OP liked Sonic games as a kid because he liked flashy games with cartoon characters in them, rather than being particularly drawn to the gameplay loop itself, and has subsequently grown up to find that no longer has the same appeal. That's fine mate, really. I happen to really enjoy the basic movement in "classic" Sonic games, to me there's nothing else quite like rolling through a loop and then jumping off a ramp to gain massive height, taking you up to another path.

Here's to positive ions :thumbsup:

EDIT: I must add, has anyone who throws out the "can't react in time" argument ever actually played a Mario game? The classic Mario games will just kill you dead because of a mistake that you only made because you hadn't memorised the level, at least Sonic has the rings system, and ample checkpoints - plus the fact that whenever you jump or roll you are effectively invunerable to most enemies, which allows for even the greatest of idiots to barrel through the levels without actually dying, or if they do, not being sent back that far. I personally find that Sonic 2 (Metropolis Zone, specifically), is the real offender for just throwing shit at you just to be a dick about it, but that's why it's my least favourite out of the classic 5.
This post has been edited by Caniad Bach: 07 January 2019 - 01:18 PM

#67 User is offline Laughingcow 

Posted 07 January 2019 - 01:37 PM

  • Posts: 485
  • Joined: 06-August 17
  • Gender:Male
Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one & they're usually full of shit.

Hit pieces come and go but sales are eternal. You can argue the metaphysical merits (or lack thereof) of a given piece of fiction but it means little to continuation of said fiction (or in more realistic terms, it's maker). Again, I direct you to the Third Rate Gamer.



#68 User is offline SpeedStarTMQ 

Posted 07 January 2019 - 01:49 PM

  • Posts: 2285
  • Joined: 20-April 10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK
  • Wiki edits:5
I've always love the 2D games, and (only to a lesser extent more recently) the DreamCast era titles. The 7th Generation of gaming consoles is where I nearly completely lost interest in Sonic (including the handheld games, though they were alright) and since then only the odd game has really caught my attention. I really did want to love Sonic through 2005 - 2012 but I just couldn't, despite me buying most of the games in that time.

I've never changed my mind about the older MegaDrive titles and Sonic mania reinforced to me that those games were absolutely fantastic and a reason why they are held in such high regard.

#69 User is offline Boxer Hockey 

Posted 07 January 2019 - 06:42 PM

  • Posts: 116
  • Joined: 07-November 11
I do feel bad for Negative Ion, as I don't think his video was meaning to be anything trite, or even something that doesn't deserve to exist in a greater discussion.
I do think though, that in any situation you have to know your audience. This is a place where, obviously, people that like Sonic games in some capacity come to talk about them. The things about the games that are liked or disliked are continually in debate but at some level it stems from a place of optimism. Even when being negative about certain aspects, the end goal in mind is usually "Sonic would be better if: ".
Looking for a solution VS. detailing a failure. It seems subtle but it's the difference between optimism and cynicism. The former begs discussion, the latter begs an argument.
Don't know if you're still around Ion, but I would recommend in the future if your goal is to start a discussion to frame it in such a way. If you don't like Sonic games, instead frame your thesis as what you would like to see. Some may consider it semantics, but again, discussion best stems from a point of invitation. So if your goal is really to look for discussion and not merely give a lecture, try to keep that in focus when opening a topic. If the thesis is just that Sonic is a lost cause then yes, maybe not the best venue but you're in luck because there are plenty of those arounddd loollllll

#70 User is offline Chibisteven 

Posted 08 January 2019 - 02:18 AM

  • Posts: 1249
  • Joined: 20-August 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:US
  • Wiki edits:11
Being the kid that was picked on in school for liking Sonic (Elementary and Middle) and consequently another totally different franchise (when I was a teen in middle and high school) as well, I usually don't talk about things I like that much anymore. I didn't bother to watch the original poster's video as I felt no point in doing so. Everybody is different and if you don't like something that's okay as long as it doesn't turn into what I had to go through. For the record I still really like Sonic.

#71 User is offline Sir_mihael 

Posted 08 January 2019 - 04:16 PM

  • DON'T TRUST THIS MAN
  • Posts: 705
  • Joined: 26-June 11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Isle of Wight, UK

View PostCaniad Bach, on 07 January 2019 - 01:06 PM, said:

Here's to positive ions :thumbsup:

Eyyyyy :v:

Nothing I can add that hasn't already been said. I think people have that phase, especially on the Internet where they graduate from "I don't like this THEREFORE IT SUCKS AND YOU SUCK FOR LIKING IT" to "I don't like this, therefore it's not for me, regardless of it's value to others."

I love a lot of things I know are actually a bit crap, and I can't get into other things which I know are critically acclaimed and well liked. That's just... people and life, innit. I know this is a vague blanket response to general opinions but I guess it's a good time as any to throw it out here.

This thread has been a good read overall.

#72 User is offline XRick 

Posted 08 January 2019 - 05:49 PM

  • Posts: 104
  • Joined: 17-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Wiki edits:2
Don't worry, @Sir_mihael, you're not alone on that mindset. I speak from experience...unfortunately...

#73 User is offline The Growler 

Posted 09 January 2019 - 09:00 AM

  • Posts: 1132
  • Joined: 05-January 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sheffield, UK

View PostNaean, on 07 January 2019 - 08:04 AM, said:

For everyone who has any interest in video games, generally speaking, I'd argue that there's likely to be at least 1 specific game or 1 game genre out there that can appeal to them, even if not a perfect fit. In fact, no game is ever immaculate; there is always room for some improvement, or a different way to execute an idea. At the same time though, it can be useful to reflect on yourself sometimes, and you may come to the conclusion of "Perhaps, this type of game/this specific game, just isn't for me.", or something to a similar effect.

Hence the reason the Sonic fanbase is so completely fractured, increasingly so for every "re-imagining" of Sonic that the Sonic Team brings out. There will always be fans of one style of Sonic game (well.. I suppose except for Sonic 06 and Boom, those were just epic failures), and so ST tries to put all their fingers into all the pies - and just makes a mess in the end.

I think Negative Ions' expectation of this community was rather misunderstood (or rather, misplaced) by the sounds of it. Ether that, or he was treating us like a YouTube channel, thinking we are here to watch whatever he throws at us.
This post has been edited by The Growler: 09 January 2019 - 09:03 AM

#74 User is offline Adamis 

Posted 09 January 2019 - 09:13 AM

  • Gimme waffles!
  • Posts: 1059
  • Joined: 16-January 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Project:Lammy and "Fafnir"
  • Wiki edits:53
No, even Boom and 06 have their fans. I like Sonic 2006 myself and I've seen people praising Sonic Boom on Twitter.

#75 User is offline Naean 

Posted 09 January 2019 - 11:31 AM

  • Self-employed artist with affinity for fine detail pen drawings.
  • Posts: 492
  • Joined: 25-February 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United Kingdom
  • Project:2D. Sonic Level Designs
  • Wiki edits:24

View PostCaniad Bach, on 07 January 2019 - 01:06 PM, said:

I didn't watch the video because honestly there's enough negativity on YouTube, and I have better things to do with my time than look at the reasons why someone doesn't like something. It appears the lad put effort and thought into this, but I would argue it's misplaced. I'd much rather hear about something someone is actually passionate about

It's understandable if you, or anyone else, chooses not to watch a video with a primarily negative vibe/tone. After all, life can be stressful, and positive videos can be a great distraction to help keep us happy, especially after a hectic day at work for example. Beyond that, it's also every individual's choice what they do and do not watch, and barring some extreme exceptions, nobody should ever feel downright mandated to watch anything. :)

However, (And feel free to correct me if I am misinterpreting your statement here.) passion does not come purely in the form of positive content. I am passionate about the Sonic series, and that includes my very firm opinions and critique on some of the Sonic games that I dislike the most, which will inevitably include negativity. Does this mean that I am not "actually passionate" about the Sonic series? Absolutely not.

Passion should not be inherently positive, and in fact if it always was, I'd heavily argue that passion would be far less fruitful. For example, if you're passionate about working on a project, and passion is your main driving force, but you mandate that the main passion aspect must be entirely positive, then I'd argue that your project is significantly more likely to be hindered in its quality. By isolating yourself into a 100% positive vacuum, the failure to learn from past mistakes - yours or otherwise - is notably more likely to occur, since analysis of previous errors will inevitably detract from pure positivity. Things that you are less fond of will undoubtedly bring up some level of negativity, but it's probably worth it in order to, in this example, not repeat errors in future, and in turn, could lead to better long term positivity via the better execution of your project.


View PostCaniad Bach, on 07 January 2019 - 01:06 PM, said:

If the argument is "Well it just isn't for me", then - no offence intended, why should I care about some random person on the internet telling me that something isn't for them? Football isn't for me, so I stay out of the World Cup threads.

To each their own, but I find that sometimes it can be useful to listen to opposing perspectives, even if those perspectives are strikingly different to your own. Humans, like all animals, are imperfect, and personal bias in favour of something (In this case, Sonic.) has the potential to cloud - even if only minimally - your judgement of certain elements. Outside perspectives which are not ingrained with positive vibes and happy experiences, have the potential to analyse some things better and critique aspects with less margin for 'excuse', for lack of a better term.

Full admittance that this may come off as a huge false equivalency, but I find this somewhat similar to a sour relationship, which started off good but slowly got worse over time. Video games and relationships are very different things of course, but I think that there are some shared general principles at hand here. People who stick together in a bad relationship, constantly trying to work things out but also simultaneously arguing frequently, can sometimes fail to see the bigger picture and get out of such a toxic scenario. They've become so ingrained as a couple that one or both of them completely miss the specifics of what is truly going wrong, all the while outside people looking in are saying "End the relationship now, living separately is the only long term solution!" etcetera.

Again, a completely different (And really serious.) scenario compared to critiquing a video game, however my point stands as this: when you're so deeply involved in something, whether it be serious or minor, it can be people external to that deep involvement that can sometimes make you think along the lines of "Hmm, what if they have a point to be made here, that I haven't considered?". Even if their input turns out to not benefit you, (Whatever the scenario may be.) being at least slightly absorbent to some perspectives outside of 'the zone' you're in/your community/etcetera, I think is a healthy mindset.

I'm not saying that you (Or anyone else for that matter.) has a bad mindset, far from it. I'm simply pointing out that some outside perspectives can have the potential to be useful, (Even if not helpful to some in the long run.) and as such, the notion of disregarding anything and everything of the sort as definitely valueless strikes me as a tad too strict and somewhat stubborn. To clarify, I'm not implying that anyone has stated outright something such as "disregarding anything and everything of the sort as definitely valueless", I'm just voicing my concerns regarding what I see as potential over-negativity towards 'opposing views'.
This post has been edited by Naean: 09 January 2019 - 11:44 AM

  • 6 Pages +
  • ◄ First
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
    Locked
    Locked Forum

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users