Sonic 4: Episode 2 Discussion Electric Bogaloo
#2821
Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:10 PM
#2822
Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:32 PM
Solid SOAP, on 24 April 2012 - 11:58 AM, said:
Is it fair to say that this is a longer/more satisfying game than Episode I? From what I've seen, the levels are longer, there's more variety in gameplay between acts, the special stages are more difficult, etc. Would I be correct in assuming that instead of this being a 45 minute to an hour long game, it's more of an hour to an hour and a half? Maybe two hours? I hope I'm not getting my hopes up.
#2823
Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:43 PM
#2824
Posted 24 April 2012 - 03:46 PM
#2827
Posted 24 April 2012 - 04:17 PM
#2829
Posted 24 April 2012 - 04:28 PM
Chaos Rush, on 24 April 2012 - 04:17 PM, said:
Thank You!! I mean I get why they're being used but damn.. there's no point when everyone reading this forum will click and read them. Get real, there's nothing you can possibly be spoiling on here.
#2830
Posted 24 April 2012 - 04:32 PM
Knucklez, on 24 April 2012 - 04:28 PM, said:
Chaos Rush, on 24 April 2012 - 04:17 PM, said:
Thank You!! I mean I get why they're being used but damn.. there's no point when everyone reading this forum will click and read them. Get real, there's nothing you can possibly be spoiling on here.
Yeah, my point was that this game isn't "good" enough to use spoiler tags. I mean, Sonic Colors or Generations I can understand, but Sonic 4 Episode II? Really?
#2831
Posted 24 April 2012 - 04:32 PM
Spoiler tags should be used for pretty much anything that's not supposed to be public knowledge yet. Some people may want to discuss the game without ruining it for themselves - yes, I know it's probably not many but it's extra consideration for those that do.
I will agree though, some people are needlessly spoiler-tagging stuff that really doesn't need it.
#2833
Posted 24 April 2012 - 04:43 PM
Chaos Rush, on 24 April 2012 - 04:32 PM, said:
Knucklez, on 24 April 2012 - 04:28 PM, said:
Chaos Rush, on 24 April 2012 - 04:17 PM, said:
Thank You!! I mean I get why they're being used but damn.. there's no point when everyone reading this forum will click and read them. Get real, there's nothing you can possibly be spoiling on here.
Yeah, my point was that this game isn't "good" enough to use spoiler tags. I mean, Sonic Colors or Generations I can understand, but Sonic 4 Episode II? Really?
The moderators said so. I don't think posts which flagrantly spoil everything without being spoilered will last long in this topic.
On topic, I've looked through everything. This game is definitely not up to Sonic 2 or 3K, but if I may go into blasphemous territory, it's just a hair or two short of Sonic 1 fun-wise. I didn't really like Sonic 1 that much either, so take it with a boulder of salt.
Still, not gonna get it until it's cheap, and even then, only because it has Metal Sonic and a certain other zone theme which I like in it.
#2834
Posted 24 April 2012 - 04:44 PM
#2835
Posted 24 April 2012 - 04:46 PM
Chaos Rush, on 24 April 2012 - 04:17 PM, said:
Chaos Rush said:
Like it or not, this game is a popular topic at the moment and a lot of people are paying attention. Spoiler tags concerning things haven't been officially revealed are totally reasonable, especiallly considering that the game shouldn't have even been made available. I imagine that not everyone would like to know about about the whole game from beginning-to-end before playing it.
Spoiler tags are just a precaution, and are as inconvenient as a single click. Not really worth complaining about.
